Journal: NATURE MATERIALS
Author: S. Goswami and Adam J. Matula et al.
Affiliation: NUSNNU-NanoCore, National University of Singapore
Publication date: 2017.10.23
Summarized by Taewon Seo
v. Molecular view of compound mer-[Ru(L)3](PF6)2 structure (Fig. 1-a)
v. Schematic of device(Fig.1-b)
v. Basic device (type A), second device (type B) (Fig.1-c)
v. Au nanoparticles are sputtered in type B
v. Current density-voltage characteristics for device A (Fig.2)
v. Current density-voltage characteristics for device B (Fig.2)
v. Nano scale test device(Fig.3)
v. Raman spectra measured for thin-film devices (E1 = 1,365cm-1, E2 = 1,313cm-1, E3 = 1,275cm-1) (Fig.4)
v. E1 : neutral, E2 : single-electron reduction, E3 : doubly reduced species
v. Correlation between Raman peaks and film conductance (Fig.5)
v. In the on-state, all molecules are same redox state.
– Role of counterions
v. LUMO of [Ru(L)3]2+, the strongest π-acceptor ligands (Fig.6)
v. Variation in HOMO and LUMO energy levels (Fig.7)
v. Variation in Electrode and LUMO energy levels (Fig.8)
v. The spatial molecule and counterion results in the formation of dipoles.
v. The applied electric field in the device displace counterions from on pocket to another.
– Device performance
v. Read-write pulse sequence for device A & B